“I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by thread, into the fabric of their lives.” - Tolstoy
Toke-A-Day May Keep Old Memory Functioning
The dung worriers and Neocon liars are already trying to nullify and place obstacles for presumed Democrat voters. Purely an un-American activity and its nice to know who sides with the degenerate worms. Manipulating districts or Diebold or 24/7 fake news diverting the story and you think we should hide in the closet? This won't pertain to individuals anymore than using in states with Initiative or Constitutional protections. Outside of the Buyers Clubs covered by GvR. Corporations contracting with the government already pisstaste their employees as part of the contract since Say No Nancy. OK Birthers and Birchers. The Constitution is a %%@@$%+ regulation so get over this paranoia of regulating Banksters and Moneysluts. All too willing to spew toxins on the public if they can save a buck. Or slash wages, that means more profit on top, nothing more. Obombo has never been pro legalizing. He never made any promises to stop the drug war. The only thing he said, he has been true too and that was leaving individuals alone following the law in states with iniatives. He claims its about resources but its actually the Constitution. The one most GOPerverts burn as they wrap themselves in the flag making Amendments against flag burning and smoking pot. Freedom Phoebes. So as it stands Democrats are the only viable lesser evil. Outside of Libertard Utopia in the clouds voting for third parties with no chance. That would only serve to Perot the GOP giving it to Obombo anyway. It's going to wind down to those who profit on the Ganjawar vs those who don't. Investing in corporations pisstasting or profiting on the war can not call themselves Legalizers or reformers and expect anyone hearing them to keep a straight face. It's still about the money sillies.
Alobama has done more than anyone since Carter. As any Chicago politician would. Coupled with Clintonian Legalsleeze. They can't wipe us out. All they can do is manipulate the truth. Flat out Perjury is a reality, with real consequences. So gossip is used, without false statements to come back and haunt them. Every level of Prohibition is the reference to justify the next level. So the FDA can't test until the HHS requests it after the IOM evaluates previous thousands of tests stating it is a safe, non addictive, non threatening substance unworthy of scheduling. After the DEA request it. As it stands all NIDA tests are for non medicinal purposes. Yet they have patented <B>individual cannabinoids</B> and paved the way for Big Pharma and sublingual Satevex. The smoke bogeyman puttin the fear of gawd in the believers. Comparisons by the IOM were done with cigarette studies, not tobacco. Added chemicals. The IOM never touched a bud, and is still stalled with the HHS. It reiterated previous studies from La Guardia to the Indian Hemp Commission. All of it is Corporate Government suppression, to oppression then depression buying their white powder pills to "treat" the symptoms.
Is The DEA Legalizing THC?
NeoCon Flicts of Interest Bush Barthwell & Bayer
If a pharmaceutical product contains THC extracted from the marijuana plant, that would be a legal commodity.
He has freed up local researchers for PTSD treatments. The government has had synthetics of various potencies since the 50's. So blaming Alobama for saying what he never said is weak. Alobama has never been for stoners and that includes in his circles sick stoners. If the 10th Amendment didn't engage with states having laws authorizing it for individual citizens. He wouldn't. I think the Cashkowski's do their schpeil, and the lyingharts follow orders. They are very careful in their wording and whenever its about not busting, its about individual sick people in states with laws authorizing it, not dispensaries that fall under the Commerce SantaClause. (The Feds won't bust individuals in states without protective laws either, but the state and local cops can. Theoretically in some pig headed counties state and local cops can't bust individuals in the 16 states and DC with initiatives.
FDA Approves Study of Cannabis for PTSD
I don't even believe Alobama is trying to be true to the 10th amendment. I think its a whole card knowing the republicans regard it as holy. %@*# with the 10th voting, driving and drugs go to DC. Same as taxing local service jobs receiving Fed money. Cops, Nurses, Fire, Teachers. Transferring 30% of the designated funds to kids, patients etc. over to Alobama or whatever marionette takes its slot. Same as why the Feds Inc. get more back from Koch prisoners @ $72k/y than the person working minimum wage. The technicality that puts them in cages is irrelevant. This may be a warning to unprotected states to act quickly and most importantly use Science to enact the laws. Or it will be a hodgepodge of reds and green states. Seems almost inevitable in the Palin oxy Rush Huckabee prehistoric land of doubting Evolution and caging sick people for their medicinal plants. Not to mention the GOPolitical Cowboy's workin' up a Number 6 on young and minority voters where they go a-ridin' into town, a-whompin' and a-whumpin' every livin' thing that moves within an inch of its life. Except the women folks, of course. "We rape the +%+! out of them at the Number Six Dance later on." ~ Gil Kerlikowske

More evidence of a ratcheted-up federal war on marijuana
Science-free zone
2011 National Drug Control Strategy
U.S. Rules That Marijuana Has No Medical Use. What Does Science Say?
"marijuana" according to the feds, has no medicinal use. They are not saying THC has no medicinal use, just smoking it has none, and should remain schedule#1. Sublingually hasn't been approved in the US, leaving synthetics, as they have had since the 50's or longer.
The Counterculture Colonel
Bud Beats Mairdinol for Pain

ELECTION 2008: Your Next President on Drugs by Marc Emery
There are two candidates in the Democratic Party who have very positive cannabis reform platforms. In our opinion, the best Democratic candidate is US Congressman Dennis Kucinich
Mike Gravel, a former senator from Alaska (1969-1981) is a candidate who wants to legalize possession of marijuana, decriminalize hard drugs and treat addiction, and end the Iraq War immediately.
Granite Staters ask each candidate where they stand on DEA raids of medical users and what they would do as President. Senators Joe Biden, Hilary Clinton, Barack Obama, Chris Dodd, and John Edwards all claim they would end the raids on medical patients in med-pot states, but I am unconvinced. Richardson, Obama, Clinton, Edwards, Dodd and Biden all favor keeping non-medical marijuana use criminal, and all five Senators voted to authorize The Patriot Act.
Senator Barack Obama has also smoked pot and calls it a mistake but doesn't regret it. He has consistently voted to fund the Iraq War, but says he's against it. On August 21, during a campaign event in Nashua, New Hampshire, Sen. Obama was asked by GSMM volunteer and seriously ill Nashua resident Scott Turner if he would end the federal raids on medical marijuana patients like him. Sen. Obama replied, "I would not have the Justice Department prosecuting and raiding medical marijuana users. It's not a good use of our resources." But America's great black hope is short on substance in every department. Obama has no plans to alter the drug war and his lukewarm rhetoric on medical cannabis patients is an untrustworthy committal. "Not good use of resources" is the lamest of all explanations for opposing a policy.
Meet the New Boss.jpg
Same as the Old Boss
"Senator Joseph R. Biden, Jr. is a leader in Congress on combating drug use and stopping the flow of drugs from reaching our shores. In an effort to curb drug use, Senator Biden wrote the law creating the nation's "Drug Czar" who oversees and coordinates national drug control policy. To further 'protect' our kids from the scourge of drugs, Senator Biden wrote the law that triples penalties for criminals who use kids to sell drugs, toughens penalties for selling drugs near playgrounds and schools, and increases penalties for drug use and drug trafficking in prisons. It also provides millions of dollars to give law enforcement officials the resources they need to combat drug use in communities nationwide."
Hillary Clinton's husband, Bill Clinton, was the US president who oversaw marijuana arrests go from 380,689 in 1993 to 734,498 in 2000, the last year of Bill's presidency. In Hillary Clinton's seven years as Senator from New York State, she never once criticized the federal drug war or the New York State Rockefeller laws (mandating extremely long jail sentences for small time distribution). She only recently agreed she would stop federal raids on medical patients as president, but has no credibility on the drug war or the Iraq War - she votes for both.
John Edwards said: "What I will do as president is, we will not be going in and raiding the use of marijuana for medical purposes in states that have legalized it.
Barack Obama Comes Out in Favor of Marijuana Decriminalization
January 31, 2008
For the first time since his presidential bid began, the Obama Campaign has clarified the Senator's position on marijuana: stop arresting people for it.
"I think we need to rethink and decriminalize our marijuana laws," Mr. Obama told an audience during a debate at Northwestern University in 2004.
Update: Tragically, the Obama campaign has now reversed its position on decrim. Most of the above can be disregarded entirely.
Only by reading things into it. He hasn't changed his position. Only busting those he knows he has jurisdiction over, Buyers Clubs, large grow ops, not individuals.
Nevermind, Barack Obama Wants to Arrest Marijuana Users After All
February 01, 2008
At first, Obama spokesman Tommy Vietor said that the candidate had "always" supported decriminalizing marijuana, suggesting his 2004 statement was correct. Then after the Times posted copies of the video on its Web site today, his campaign reversed course and declared he does not support eliminating criminal penalties for marijuana possession and use.
"If you're convicted of a crime, you should be punished, but that we are sending far too many first-time, non-violent drug users to prison for very long periods of time, and that we should rethink those laws," Vietor said. The spokesman blamed confusion over the meaning of decriminalization for the conflicting answers.
Decriminalization and Legalization - what do they mean?
pete@drugwarrant.com
